Overview of BilboBaggins

Recent Posts

anxiety / depression with lit review?
B

Quote From cornflower:

I am lucky if I can write a ten word sentence in ten minutes on my lit review when I keep having to go back and check exactly what it was the authors of one paper were really saying.


When I was writing my thesis (including very complex later chapters) I would write very quickly, with lots of "..." or "blah blah blah" bits, where I couldn't remember the details, but didn't want to interrupt my flow to stop and go and check things. That way I could get a lot of words down quickly, could get the overall shape in place, and then worried about going back to sort out the finer details later on. And it worked. Could you try something like this?

Viva - minor corrections
B

Congratulations :)

Tired and furious
B

I'd say no to your supervisor if I was you! If you're working full-time, then writing a chapter in a week isn't feasible IMHO. There has to be some reality to this.

I got very good at saying no to my supervisors, due to my neurological disease. I always knew if something was too much, and wouldn't be backwards in saying so :)

anxiety / depression with lit review?
B

Have you tried recording your ideas in speech form? This isn't writing in the usual form, but is more like brainstorming. If you have a tape recorder or a recording programme on your computer it's easy to do. This might help break the impasse. Record your vague ideas about what you need to write, in any rambling form that you see fit. Then you can play it back and type up what you said, and take that as a starting point.

I also gave you advice in an earlier thread. I guess that didn't help :(

I would recommend going to see your doctor. This is getting severe, and you're going to have harder things to deal with later on in the PhD. So you need to find a way of coping.

Good PG Diploma vs bad MSc?
B

i agree with the advice to resubmit. Failing a Masters dissertation is an extremely worrying sign for anyone wanting to go onto a PhD. At least if you resubmit and successfully pass you've overcome that hurdle, and have shown you can do it. And, yes, doing a PhD thesis is much much harder than doing a Masters dissertation.

The only other way around might be if there were very good external reasons why you failed. But even those would have to be overcome and be in the past for you to be able to go on to do a PhD.

My interim evaluation experience
B

I think you need to view it as a learning experience, and take what you can from it, both in terms of things to do better, and things to avoid doing in future.

Was your supervisor on the panel? If not can you seek more advice from them on how to frame the methodological / questionnaire issue in your ultimate viva? And being too cocky isn't a good thing either: it's likely to rub an examiner up the wrong way, which you want to avoid.

Also when it comes to your final viva do try to keep your temper. I know you want to stand your ground, but you've got to be reasoned in your approach.

But, yes, it's a learning experience, so take what you can from it :p

Conferences!
B

I went to 1 conference, international (Canada), just under 2 years into my 6-year part-time PhD. So I guess it would be equivalent of towards the end of 1st year full-time PhD.

I would have liked to have gone to a few more, but I'm severely disabled, and have a progressive neurological disease. I managed to attend this one, but became too disabled afterwards.

I was a history student.

Post-Viva gift for supervisor?
B

My main gift for my supervisor was a copy of my final hard bound thesis, along with a handwritten card.

Though I did also buy him some CDs full of historical directories, as an extra pressie later, because I knew he would appreciate those.

Whatever you think is appropriate will probably be fine. But my supervisor mainly wanted a copy of my thesis :)

I passed my Viva!
B

Congratulations! Delighted for you.

Are PhD standards slipping?
B

Quote From heifer:

@Bilbo - I do agree. But to my mind, 'minor corrections' implies at least a small change to the argument, rather than just fixing spelling errors. So I would say that giving someone 'minor corrections' for a few typos (i had four) would be quite harsh.


Changing the argument counts as minor revisions at my uni. So different terminology again.

But, as you say, no-one ever worries about exactly what sort of result it was.

Are PhD standards slipping?
B

Quote From heifer:

There can be a bit more to 'no corrections' than meets the eye. I was awarded my PhD with no corrections when in fact I did have a small list of typos and references to add. The examiners said they wanted to award 'pass with no corrections' in honour of the high quality of the thesis (not trying to be a big head, honest!) so all I had to do was correct the typos before the hard bound copy was submitted. Maybe this is what happened with the person mentioned in the OP?


Thanks for that. I find it strange that terminology can be so different though. I had the same pass basically, with a tiny list of typos to fix before the hard bound submission, but it was classed as minor corrections. I didn't care, I'd passed. But I think it's a bit daft for an examiner to say "no corrections" when there are things to be fixed. Either there are corrections or there aren't? ;-)

Are PhD standards slipping?
B

Quote From jojo:

maybe the examiner was dyslexic.. have you angry guys considered that? i think content not spelling is what should pass a phd.


My external examiner was dyslexic, so didn't pick up on typos, but instead higher-level issues. But my internal examiner picked up on typos, so I was well covered.

Part-time PhD
B

Quote From LBaines:

doing the MSc dissertation is more like being in free-fall. I'm hoping that there'll be more support or at least options to learn how to use statistical analysis of data, research methods etc.


Afraid that that wasn't my experience going from Masters to PhD. There was much more support and useful training in my Masters course. My university put on training for PhD students as well, but it was either far too generic, or started too late for me to take advantage of it. This was particularly exasperating for me as a funded student, because AHRC's award for me included an extra payment to my university to pay for more training, but I gained little in return.

Also it was based at the university during the working week, so I had to be able to go in there. I would be surprised if training at your university was different.

Basically, make the most of what you have now. You should have good supervisor support later, but other support may be more limited, especially part-time and at a distance.

Life after PhD
B

I think 4matt this is your issue and you're going to need to think carefully to work out how best to sell yourself. At this point in time you're the one under-selling yourself for jobs. You don't want to do that when you get into the jobs market!

Personally I don't think 30/31 after postgraduate study is too late at at all. I'm concerned though that you do. That is a worrying attitude to have for a soon-to-be job hunter!

I would recommend that you contact the careers service at your university and seek their advice.

It's possible your PhD won't count for anything outside academia, but you're in the situation now, and you are going to have to make the best of things. So think more positive!

Timetable/Schedule and Commuting
B

When I was a computer science PhD student the expectation was that students would be there Mon-Fri 9-5. You need to ask your prospective supervisor what would be expected of you, and if it would be possible for you to work from home for some of the time. I was EPSRC funded too.