Signup date: 27 Sep 2011 at 7:42pm
Last login: 27 Mar 2015 at 10:31pm
Post count: 370
I imagine it might just be that your nerves are manifesting themselves as depression? I think it's common to suffer withdrawal symptoms after submitting. You were constantly motivated by that goal and you reached it, but are in a bit of a limbo land until the actual VIVA. Have you felt like doing any of the things you didn't have time to during the last few weeks/months? Maybe you just need a good distraction. Just think of all the struggling PhDs who would love to be in your place! You have submitted and should be very proud! Hope you feel better soon. :-)
======= Date Modified 22 Feb 2012 22:24:29 =======
Hi Lullaby,
This fairly recent thread has lots of responses on the shortest possible duration: http://www.postgraduateforum.com/threadViewer.aspx?TID=21629
Basically, I think the answer is ''it depends'' ; if you are focused predominantly on the thesis for three years and if your supervisor is quick about reading your work and giving feedback, then 3 years is definitely possible. But, things may happen that are beyond your control - personal circumstances, internal delays in the department, etc.
I'm in the same position as you and I'm determined to get it finished within the three years. (up)
======= Date Modified 19 Feb 2012 19:59:34 =======
To be honest, I would be a bit weary of this supervisor's motivations. Has she mentioned funding possibilities for you? Or is her department simply after your fees. No-one should try to convince you to do something of this scale. You need to be the one driving the process. Her promising you her students never fail is a very negative place to begin the discussion.
Your reasons for doing a PhD have to be strong enough to get you through the difficult times. If you don't want to stay in academia and if it isn't a requirement for the work you want to do in the future, then I imagine doing it simply for the prestige is not going to be reason enough.
I think I understand what they mean: when you write a chapter, it is meant to flow - each element connecting to those before and after, without too much repetitiveness. If you make changes to X, Y, and Z at the suggestion of your supervisor, then items you insert or cut have a knock-on effect on various parts of the chapter. Basically, you have to use your intuition to work out what relates to what else and in what way. You need to always be aware of the questions you have raised and whether or not you answer them in a way that makes sense to the reader.
I know that might seem like a convoluted response, but it's a difficult question to answer!
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree