======= Date Modified 11 Apr 2010 14:12:26 =======
Yes, I would really like some coaching aboutthe quiote button, especially if stiops the petty tit for tat squabble you seem to enjoy so much. I may also make you feel like an expert, and I can see you enjoy that.
Also, as you are so upet about my typos a new key board would help. As I .study arts, I can't afford one myself
Mods, don't you have rules about lack of respect for other people's research areas? How incredibly rude Moob is? Did you get some special training for that, moob?
======= Date Modified 11 Apr 2010 14:51:56 =======
So where's the training in the quotes thing then? I meant it, I would really like to know.
It's fine by me to think studying film, or whatever you like, is inane. I think areas of the sciences are damaging, and inane. But I wouldn't think it my place to 'teach' PhD students their subject in those areas by giving them criticism about the method of their discipline, and I wouldn't join in thread discussion that relate to their subjects either.
I
======= Date Modified 11 Apr 2010 14:55:07 =======
Thank you Manboob, that was not condescending at all; however, when you say 'your' avatar etc, do you mean the avatar of person who I will be quoting, and not 'my' avatar? Because I can't find one, or a quote button, on screen, as I'm writing.
======= Date Modified 11 Apr 2010 15:34:51 =======
Hi moob, I have tonnes of marking to do and I really don't want to get into a lengthy debate with you about this, especially as you think it is such a inane suject, so I can only presume yor reason for banging on about it comes down to some kind of insecurity or ego issue. Or that you secrretly wish you were doing a phD in film stuies (however, just remember the key board sacrifices you would have had to make if you hade made that choice) and hate your wn subject.
I am probably writing this because I want to avoid marking, but I am giving my valuable time to you so please read what I write this time, properly. You apperaed to ignore much of what I said last time. Remember, I am sacrifing time outdside in the glorious, and rare, sunshine to do this for you.
However, here is my response:
1.Yes, the role of women, as portrayed in films, has changed over time, and this does relate to feminism, although it is not necessarily 'feminism in film' perse, what you descibe would more accurately be termed 'representation of women in film'. The topic you describe is incredibly broad and would need to be narrowed down dramatically for any level of acdemic writing from pre-GCSE upwards. It would not be accepted as a PhD topic as it stands, and it would make a pretty disastrous first year undergrad essay. Also, it has been studied, extensively, already - it's kind of A'Level standard stuff, in terms of broad subject matter.
2. Having worked on many films, British and American, I have observed that actors do not make much difference to the overarching aspects of the characters they portray, that lies in the hands of the writers, directors and producers they work for. Actors are, on the whole, highly skilled interpreters of what other people want them to do. This is a widley accepted reality of the film making process, both in the industry and in academia. Marlon Brando was a notable exeption to this, otherwise universal, mode of practice, and he did create his own characters: People run research projects in him as an anomily within dramtic construction because of it. It may be intersting to look at Last Tango in Paris in terms of feminism and his performance, but that is not a French film and Brando is not a French actress.
3. Becasue of the above, it would be much more productive to interview the film's director and producers if researching the topic you suggest: they call the shots and have to issue approval on all creative decisions n the film-making process. But, if you look back at my earlier post, you will see why that approach is not always that fruitful or ncessary.
They're the main points, and now I'm going out to enjoy the sunshine now, I hope we can be at peace: Even if you think what I do is inane, you don't have to voice it so much, in a thread which is about arts PhDs.
P.s. I have far to much to do to be sitting here repeating things and I want paying for any further tuition on this topic.
Hi Jenny, I submitted my thesis in 3yrs exactly, I'm in the sciences so my thesis would be quite short in comparison to one in the humanities. The thing about research is knowing when enough is enough and there is always going to be things you want to put into your thesis no matter how long it is. I would say set yourself personal goals, have a weekly timetable( a routine is good:-) ), allowing for holidays, sickness etc. At the start everybody hopes to finish in 3yrs but we dont know what these three years will bring, set yourself the 3yr target, but remember there is the choice of extension if you need it!
Good Luck :-)
Hi again moob, a final bit of free advice: If you are researching the effects of feminist representations of women (in any area of cinema) on audiences, the you will need to reserach your audiences, rather than the people who make the films. Thisis called a cultural studies approach and borrows much from sociology and psychology, some of the others may be able to help you with a suitable set of methods for testing your thesis, whatever it may be.
Masters Degrees
Search For Masters DegreesPostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766