Quote From pm133:
It would absolutely be a mistake to consider hard sciences and technology as reliable. Both worlds are crammed full of people doing utterly useless research with no credible pretence at even aiming at practical usage. Here is a very simple and obvious example. If academic science is so convinced of its worth, why does it insist on producing indecipherable papers written in deliberately archaic language and locking them away behind pay walls? Who are they writing these articles for? It certainly isn't the general public who are paying for all this nonsense.
The first sentence of your second paragraph is the core of the pack of lies which academic science spouts in order to justify its existence and secure funding. Almost nobody is involved in uncovering "truths" or producing any benefits whatsoever to society.
I understand that we need people doing genuinely out of the box stuff but right now, in the depths of our economic problems, academic science has a duty in my opinion to step up and start using scarce public money to start producing more useful outputs that could realistically help society. In short, science needs to get its finger out and start doing something to justify its vast budget.
Haha! So other people think this too! I sometimes think that academia is a classic case of the emporor having no clothes on!
Having said that though, I also do acknowledge that the pursuit of science has achieved many excellent things as well. And going back to the original post on this thread - maybe for some of us, the good outweighs the bad, and so we will choose to stay in academia.
I am undecided at present. I enjoy what I do right now and would have to find something else I enjoyed equally well or more before I seriously considered leaving. However, if my motivation was money or prestige or something else, I would most certainly have left academia by now.