Hello Everyone,

Last night I was working on my lit review and I found that the deeper I dig, the more material I find that supports the fact that while my ideas are good, they're not as original as I thought. I'm finding that, in this modern world, where we have access to pretty much all research that has been ever done, it's difficult to find a niche. My supervisor, who effectively told me my topic, may not be aware of the state-of-the-art research that's going on in the field. I'm hoping this feeling of uselessness will pass. Am I alone here? Thanks. Wishing everyone a happy start to the week/year!

Last year I met a professor from another university and approached him about writing a journal article together on a topic that is not that similar to my main research. In fact, I suspect this research will prove a point that is contrary to the beliefs of my supervisor. Should I mention the article/research at all to my supervisor? In general, if the supervisor is paying me, should his name go on everything I publish during my PhD? It's a tough call. Thanks everyone!