Overview of HazyJane

Recent Posts

Pass - Merit - Distinction
H

Quote From avennus:
Hi

Can somebody answer this question?


Probably not. Grade boundaries vary from uni to uni, as do the weightings of the taught and dissertation components. Some Masters courses don't even award a 'merit' grade - mine was just either pass or distinction. So you'd be better off checking your course handbook (if you have one) or contacting the teaching office.

Getting a shop job and applying for a PhD
H

That's good advice from Wowzers. Also consider contacting local departments to see what seminar series they have which are open to external people, and start going along to get to meet people. Twitter is a good place to develop an academic network, and sometimes jobs and funding opportunities are circulated there. Look out for prizes (e.g. essay competitions) and one day courses/seminars that you could possibly attend to keep your hand in and build up your CV.

Getting a shop job and applying for a PhD
H

Any decent supervisor will realise you have to make ends meet while waiting for a PhD to come up.

The important thing, I'd say, is that even if working in a completely different area, try to maintain as much contact as you can with academia, whether face to face or online. It might help you network and find out about opportunities that you might not hear about otherwise.

Two Discouraging Verdicts on Publications
H

Quote From Mackem_Beefy:
Is the impact rating that important anymore? When most of us look for papers we use the internet to search for papers relevant to our topics of research, then download and read them with a cursory nod at most as to which journal they were printed in.

I personally think in the days of the internet, too much attachment is made to impact ratings. I'm more interested in the quality of the document and there's some decent documents with good research even in lower impact journals.

Ian (Mackem_Beefy)


I heartily agree. Though, unfortunately, job interviewers and funding committees can still get a little hung up on them, so it's probably still advisable to try to get at least a couple of 'high impact' journal names on your publications list.

With a few exceptions, I do find the concept of journals to be increasingly redundant for the reasons you state. It's quite helpful to have similar things bundled together, but like you, I do my searches online and read what is relevant regardless of where it's published.

Two Discouraging Verdicts on Publications
H

Quote From incognito:
Quote From MeaninginLife:
When i rejected some papers, i also used words like 'well-exectued' and 'interesting' such that the comments do not appear very discouraging. i may not really mean it...

However, the reviewers can be biased... Yes. 8% is quite low.


Your comments are not helpful whatsoever: the editor could've meant it or not- it's 50/50 and it doesn't change the outcome. If your mission is to put people needing advice down then maybe you shouldn't post messages.

MeaninginLife is being honest - sometimes reviewers' comments are meaningful, sometimes they are generic. The point is that unless they give specific feedback on actual details of your work then the comments in the editor's letter are probably not worth spending too much energy on.

Overall the initial scenario you describe sounds quite positive. You've got one journal quite interested in your work. The other one, well you took a punt on a top-flight, high impact, generalist journal that rejects 92% of the stuff sent to it. That you got rejected is in no way a reflection of the quality of work, so don't let it knock your confidence. Take the advice and identify a decent more specialist journal to try.

One other thing - the process around submitting and being rejected seems to have taken you a bit by surprise. Talk to other people in your department about their publishing experiences and also google around to find advice (see especially, perceptions of "Reviewer 3"). In my field people compete over how quickly they get rejected by the British Medical Journal (fastest time I've heard: 15 mins!). So accept that this is all a normal experience which you will come across again throughout your career.

Looking for a TOP programmer to partner up for PhD reaserch in Software Defined Networks
H


I propouse a partnership to do a Phd , do reaserch and write the thessis together.


I don't think this is permitted at any legitimate university.

Any Advice for this Lost Soul?!
H

Not as yet, I still have a few months to go. Reading stuff here and elsewhere has made me aware in advance of the challenging nature of the job hunt so I am bracing myself for that.

Even if you don't have access to a careers service, friends and colleagues can still be useful for casting an eye over your CV, especially if they're in the roles you're working towards. It doesn't mean your CV is bad, it could just be that you're not emphasising the right things, or highlighting certain things well enough. No harm in asking them!

Basically, make as much use as you can of anyone who can give pointers or advice. They may also know of some opportunities to point you towards. Most people are usually happy to help.

Any Advice for this Lost Soul?!
H

Was it a mistake to do the PhD? It's just so depressing to see ppl who don't even have a Bachelors working and getting married, etc.


Is there any point dwelling on this question? You've done a PhD and the important thing is how you use that to move on to the next adventure/challenge in life. If that doesn't turn out to be a postdoc, it doesn't meet the PhD was a waste of time.

Try not to compare your life to others'. No-one has a straightforward ride and you don't know what challenges your peers may have faced in the past or will in the future. Do you really resent people "who don't even have a Bachelors" finding some happiness or success in their work or personal lives? For all you know, they may be looking at you enviously for the freedom you had to pursue education to the highest level and work overseas.

The job hunting is tough and the academic job market is ropey. That sucks, and is bound to wear you down. But try to focus your energies on different approaches to job hunting. Have you built up any networks via your PhD/conferences? Now is the time to approach them for news on opportunities. If you have no professional network, get on Twitter/go to seminars and events and build one. Have you had someone look at your CV/application forms to check that you are putting yourself across in the best way? If you survived the PhD process you're clearly capable of hanging in there and having the stamina to keep going - treat the job hunt as a potentially long term project and apply a similar mentality if you can.

Good luck.

Can someone help me out of this chaos about self-funded PhD study
H

I agree with bewildered. But if you're still considering it, also factor into the financial calculations the 'opportunity cost' i.e. not only is there the financial cost from the tuition and your living expenses, you are also losing out on whatever salary you would be getting by doing something else instead.

Edited to add... you don't mention what your long term career plans are. If you want to be an academic engineer, then a PhD may be useful. If, however, you want to work in industry, check that a PhD would really enhance your career prospects - you may be better off without one.

Is there a difference between a "Research Associate" and a"PostDoc Fellowship"?
H

Yes. Sometimes also called 'Research Fellow'.

Shall I quit my PhD before I start?
H

That said, "museum jobs" are oft touted as options for art/humanities PhD grads, with (a) not many opportunities out there and (b) competition with adequately qualified people with BAs + Masters in museum studies.

I think it's right to be realistic about the job prospects post PhD, though it is worth thoroughly researching viable alternative careers.

No response from Unis. for the MRes/PhD proposals
H

When did you send the emails? July-Sept tends to be a difficult time to get hold of academics - as well as holidays it's conference season, supervision time for MSc students and preparation time for the start of the new academic year. So people might not be on top of their emails.

I'd caution against sending unsolicited research proposals. At best they may be ignored by busy professors; at worst your might find your ideas being pilfered.

I'm a little unsure from your post whether you have actually applied for a formal MRes programme. Usually there would be no need to approach supervisors directly in advance.

Shall I quit my PhD before I start?
H

It sounds like you have a very realistic view of the job prospects from starting a PhD which is good. A lot of people embark on the path with no idea of the challenges, and are left tremendously disappointed at the other end.

Two questions -
1. Do you have a plan B? An alternative career to pursue now or later that could give you some degree of satisfaction.
2. If your desire to do a PhD in palaeontology is primarily for interest's sake (having acknowledged the limited potential for it to translate into an actual job), do you think this is something you could do part time further down the line? Plenty of people do PhD's later in life purely for their personal satisfaction, rather than as a career goal. Perhaps this might be a way to scratch that itch?

Improving prospects (PostDoc)
H

If you want to pursue a research role, then (a) is by far the most important, and this should be an urgent priority. (b) is a good addition to your CV. (c) probably won't help you if you wanted a pure research job as it might not add anything - how common are those dual roles? They might be something you have to seek out a bit later when you've established yourself a bit more. (d) Great if you want to be a lecturer, not so important for a researcher.(e) Not sure this would help you as a post doc, apart from with regard to the professional practice of a dual role if you can find one.

If research is your interest, prioritise (a). If you're happy to move away from that and more into the lecturer side of things, (d) would come into play.

Editorial Member of Two or More Journals?
H

I don't see why not, as long as it didn't cause you a conflict of interest, though it might be sensible to check the policies of the journals in question to be sure.