Overview of Slizor

Recent Posts

Ladies - would you do this? (dating issue)
S

Quote From someone3:

Do the simple things first, like eye contact ...etc, then if not, you are the best judge.


I disagree. Elaborate things such as breaking into his house and waiting lying on his bed wearing only a bow (large and red works best) will work.

While my advice above may not be top draw (while there is a high chance of success, failure comes with a charge of breaking and entering) a shot of confidence is what you need. It's no longer (if it ever was) a case of a woman being all coy and waiting for the man to make the first move. You need to seize the bull by his horn!

sign question
S

I'm Cancer. Apparently we're sceptical of horoscopes and zodiac signs. I prefer Chinese Year animals....because I'm a Tiger (1986).

General Election 2010
S

Quote From 4matt:

I quite agree, "Keep_Calm". While I'm not from a council estate, my upbringing was hardly moneyed. I definitely agree in allowing and, indeed, facilitating excellence regardless of finance. So why is the Labour party so dead against grammar schools, which have always been the best way for youngsters with excellent minds to get the education they need, irrespective of money?


People very much disagree over the capacity of grammar schools to A) select the best students to begin with B) to offer genuinely fair access to all classes (or to operate "regardless of finance" which is a very limited notion of class.) They also disagree with grammar schools because of the impact of academic selection on non-grammar schools in grammar school LEAs. I also question, and I imagine most people would, the idea that "excellence" in education should be the thing that is prioritised. I would prefer a system where the educational needs of the vast majority, not the minority, are the priority.

It is not a simple case of they are ignoring grammar schools when there is clear supporting evidence for them; there are genuine debates about the effectness and desirability of grammar schools.
Quote From 4matt:

If you look at the way the current government has increased study of crap subjects at crap universities, encouraged the study of vacuous school subjects so that schools can look good on league tables and, in other areas, seems intent of treating with kid gloves those who make others' lives a misery, yet ignoring those who genuinely deserve help, it's not hard to come to the conclusion that they don't actually care about decent people, and are just using taxpayers' money to buy the votes of the undeserving.


Of course it is hard to come to any other conclusion. Your analysis of the empirical reality precludes any other viewpoint. Needless to say, there are many holes in your analysis of the empirical reality. Take for instance your assignation of "increasing crap subjects" and criminal sentencing to central government instead of to universities and the judicial system. And as for looking good on league tables.....league tables, and the ethos that is a result of such a move, were introduced by the last Tory government.

I can't comment on your view they ignore people who genuinely deserve help because I have absolutely no inkling as to what you are referring. Although I would question who you consider as "genuine" and "ingenuine", or "deserving" and "undeserving".

summary or conclusion?
S

Not sure what subject you're in. But (in Politics) a conclusion is where you verbally draw the argument together. It kinda should be what the previous sections were leading upto and should be a synthesis of the little arguments that were in each section to a larger overarching argument (possibly in the case of a thesis, it will involve linking the little arguments of the chapter to the argument running through the entire thesis.)

Not sure if that's relevant. If not, have a (mince)

General Election 2010
S

I have three places I could potentially vote and all are safe Labour or Lib seats.....so it may be a protest vote for me (Greens, SWP, etc.) One thing I am certain of is that I'm not voting Tory. Particularly now they've launched this "Big Society" campaign in a disingenuous attempt to be different to Thatcher. Thatcher wanted a smaller government.....the "Big Society" idea is just that. It's just a change of emphasis.

Anyhow, I'm going to hand over to my man Nye Bevan to finish this post off.

“No attempt at ethical or social seduction can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred for the Tory Party. So far as I am concerned they are lower than vermin.”

The One Goal Thread
S

Hmmm, sidetracked by one of my friends needing help on a Masters essay. I ended up writing 650 words on it. Can I count this towards my day's total...or should I push on to add 800 words to my actual work?

Day One of my 10 day goal to write my upgrade document.....not going too well.

The One Goal Thread
S

I can indeed. In fact, I can do better - it will make you lose weight!

What wonderous bar is this? Why we call it Chocolate SuperLax!

Yes that's right. Step right up Ladies, Gentlemen, and Children and try this exciting new dieting Chocolate Bar! You will fill your pants with excitement when you discover you can eat great things and lose weight!

Eat yourself thin with Chocolate SuperLax!

The One Goal Thread
S

100 words down. 900 to go. And......I'm off to the shops. Anyone want anything?

The One Goal Thread
S

======= Date Modified 15 Apr 2010 01:00:21 =======
Not really on topic this, but it's not worthy of an entire thread.

Just forced myself back into work mode after the Easter break by going on mytomatoes. I'm only an occasional user of the site and often use it one day and then forget it the next. However, what did motivate me is the word counts that I had put on my previous tomatoes (I normally label the tomatoes what doc it is and how many words it is up to.) Despite thinking I pretty much hadn't done any writing for the past two months one document has mysteriously gained 5000 words (from being 300.) Not saying that 2500 words a month is good going but it is nice to see when you have actually made some progress.


More on topic, is banging out a thousand (good) words a day for the next week and a half an achievable aim? I want to get my upgrade document sorted soonish and I think I should have more physical evidence (rather than some thoughts kicking about) of my progress so far.

Also (this is the edit), I've decided to give up beer for the rest of this month. I'm not really a fan of other forms of alcohol, so this is kinda giving up alcohol, but in a far less anti-social and adventurous way. That is my goal for the next two and a half weeks - no beer.

An arts phD in 3 years
S

You can knock an Arts PhD out in around two weeks. As previously said, the lack of rigorous methodological requirements means that they'll just accept any old shite you cobble together. That's why its the equivalent of two level 6's in year 9 SATS. So I would suggest you write your thesis in the first two weeks and then spend the rest of the time drunk.:-)


On a less serious note, having also done a lot of research before I started my PhD, my first year has been spent realising A) that not all of it is relevant B) that there is a hell of a lot more research to be done.

New party Ppe
S

Quote From sneaks:

ooh me me! I have a BSc in psychology and an MSC in a psychology related discipline AND I have lots of non-academic qualifications and music exams under my belt. Can I be PM please?


Not at the moment as you can't trump Gordon Brown (MA and PhD in History.) But if David Cameron wins you can go to Parliament and demand he bows before your academic might (he only has a BA in PPE.)

If only the world worked this way....

New party Ppe
S

Quote From garryck:

======= Date Modified 06 Apr 2010 14:14:19 =======
Dear Students

Is there anybody who would be able to help me in my campaigning in Colchester.
From the comments posted so far I will be surprised to get any kind of positive
response. If the views so far from some of the replies I have received is anything
to go by then young people from your University have little interest in a better
country or world that is a shame. (In fact I am shocked) I have taught young people
to drive for over twenty years and they have always been the most open minded
and liberated group in society.

Garryck PPc Colchester


Traditionally speaking, the concept of "good" and how to achieve a good (or better) world have been the centrepieces of political debate. It is not simply the case that because you think you stand for change (although I fail to see substantive policy evidence of this, more vacuous catchphrases) you are necessarily a force for good and for the creation of a better world. If anything it seems your ripping off of political ideas from Simon Cowell (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/14/cowell-plans-political-x-factor) would lead to a far worse world and for the vast majority of intelligent people to disagree with your ill-thought-out ideas.

I just noticed tht in the original post you put BSc Law at the bottom. There seems no real reason for this - I can only think you wish to impress us with your educational achievements. I'll tell you what. I'll match your BSc Law with a BA Politics and I'll raise you a MA International Relations.

Anyone else want to add their qualifications to this thread?

Lost my mojo
S

I agree with Bilbo, you need professional help. Consult your local barman for possible remedies. My personal suggestion is 16 units worth of Ireland's finest export (and I'm not talking about Ronan Keating.)

How about a trip to see your family/old friends? That normally helps me.

Family have offered to support my PhD, I don't know whether to take it
S

Natassia: I was in the exact same position as you last year. I did end up missing out on funding from my old University and from all the others I quickly applied to after that fell through and my parents offered to support me, which was horrendously gut-wrenching for me as I have a very strong independent streak. However, I got over it (after a few months) and accepted their offer because I wanted to do a PhD and had been unemployed for 8 months (I finished my MA dissertation in September 2008 - wrong fucking time to finish.) Anyhows, I cast around as much as I could for any opportunities at one University that had appeared particularly interested in me and ended up getting a subwardenship at a Hall of Residence. Not ideal, but it meant less parental support. On the first day I got to Uni the Head of Postgrad studies contacted me to tell me that one person had dropped out and, as a consequence, I would be receiving his fees only scholarship. Which was nice.

I know that this is entirely anecdotal, but, as my case would illustrate, there are more opportunities than simply full or self-funding. I also get to teach next year (yay!) and I know that the department has found research and office work in the Uni for other people who are a bit skint......although this seems to have dried up slightly recently.

Anyhow, that wasn't really advice, that was more my story. Hopefully you won't have to come to the decision about accepting parental help :-)

New party Ppe
S

Quote From garryck:

Well I say 2u THIS IS DEMOCRACY. What do you want instead? I have set out honestly what I will do, and if voted in I will do my level best to implement my promise to my electorate. I remember that I am their Servant and that i am there to implement their wishes, my opinion comes second.


The thing is, Britain is not a democracy in any substantive way. Our legislature (and the administration drawn from it) relies on an majoritarian constituency system that elects politicians on the basis of them representing their constituency. Arguably, although this is a system that has come about through evolution and so has no overarching design, political parties (including yours if it was elected) represent a corruption of the way in which this system of representation operates by requiring an MP to vote in line with the rest of the party. In that sense, then, your attempt to get into power through the party system, and your promise not to substantively reform the electoral system, means that you are doomed either to failure in your aims when you get into power or, much more likely, electoral failure.


Hmm, having just read your first message about X Factor style policies I feel that I've wasted my time. I mean, seriously? You think that the way to deal with apathy is to lower the requirements to get involved in politics? It would end up with an uninformed populace voting on issues they don't understand every week, instead of just every 5 years.