Overview of Slizor

Recent Posts

losing my mind
S

As to what other people have said about feeling human again, try a nice long walk: in the countryside, along a river, or on the coast. During which time just let your mind, eyes, and body wander where they will and stop concentrating on work. Don't feel guilty and see it as a waste of time, it's a way to become more time-efficient.

I also recommend something violent, like boxing.

Ph.D difficult ?
S

PhDs are really easy. I see celebrities and sports stars getting them all the time! I've also heard that a PhD is the same as 2 GCSEs, and we all know that GCSEs are getting easier!

Welcome to the forum, where people occasionally are in a bad mood and unnecessarily sarcastic.


As for the age thing, I started this year at the ripe old age of 23. I've found it really strange how Uni age is all to do with perception. For example, last year I was unemployed, had just finished my Masters and continued going to the Uni Badminton Society (needed to fill up the time) because I was one of the oldest there and had finished Uni (twice), they thought I was older than I was (25, instead of 22.) On the other end, I work as a Subwarden at a first year residence and I've had several people think I was a first year. When I've told them I wasn't, they've said "So a second year then?"

Apparently my age is somewhere between 18-25...depending on how many qualifications people know I have.

Recession and PhD funding
S

I would pitch your proposal as a Economics one - they get the most funding of the social sciences because the ESRC (created, in its current format, by Thatcher) loves Quant. work and anything that doesn't actually involve theoretical reflection or discussion. They'll give you funding if you say you keep a copies of Hayek and Friedman by your bed and have a picture of Thatcher on your ceiling.




I don't like the ESRC.

finish in 3 years?
S

3 years?! I'll be done in two, tops. Then I'll get a Professorship and publish my PhD as a best-selling book that wins both the Booker and the Nobel Peace prize.

I say this as my first deadline has slipped away without me having done the work I said I would. Hmmmm.

Quick application advice needed
S

I would e-mail your supervisor and explain, but also request an official transcript of your marks in your MSc from your Uni. The actual certificate shouldn't matter that much.

Self-proposed topic
S

If the person citing the source a la Cloggs is unable to assess the merit of the work independent of the motivation of the person who did the work, then they're really not worth worrying about.


You really need to ask around the departments you would be studying in. If you start at your Uni you can at least get a good idea of how to do it if you wish to move elesewhere.

I fancy my supervisor
S

Also recognise that, frankly, humans are fucking nuts when it comes to sex (or nut-fucking.) To prove this point I, like every good first year student, will provide you with a link to Wikipedia. PLease explore the inter-related topics, particularly genetic sexual attraction.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westermarck_effect#Westermarck_effect

Making your own Christmas presents
S

I always like making sweets - fudge, toffee, chocs. The good thing is if you practice you've got a really nice handmade present for all occasions - Valentine's Day, Birthdays, Easter, Halloween.

http://www.channel4.com/food/recipes/chefs/jamie-oliver/amazing-diy-chocolate-truffles-recipe_p_1.html

Should I do a PhD?
S

The thing with PhDs is that every department is different and everyone here will have had a different experience. So, can you give us a bit more info? What subject area? What grades did you get? etc

Searching world for Phd opportunities
S

Manobkateet: You do realise that you need prior University-level qualifications before you start a PhD? You're kind of expected to have such basic skills as being able to find a PhD programme (although, being able to find a PhD programme doesn't constitute a test of your ability to do a PhD.)

You also realise that in IR you generally have to write your own proposal (which would require a level of independence not yet seen) and without which no-one can really say what a good team is.

Should I use Endnote?
S

I would use Endnote. It may take a while to put all your sources onto it, but it will take a while anyway to create a Word bibliography/references. I'm not convinced that the old-fashioned route is that much easier.

This isn't quite related to the topic at hand......but I love Endnote. Whereas before I used to write incomplete references down on scraps of paper I can now just pop it into the library and leave it alone (particularly with books that I want, just file it into a group called "Unread".) I also use it to track my progress, but then I am in the lit review stage at the moment.

Unproductive day!
S

======= Date Modified 26 Nov 2009 02:39:46 =======
Woo! 9 episodes of Dexter and a football match. This has been my most unproductive non-hungover day so far. Thing is, I kinda stopped myself doing anything today because I had a long list of things to do and failed to think of a way to do all of them....so did none of them.



Possibly the best proof available that people on PhDs aren't necessarily smart.

Also, just to add, did think of something fucking clever in the shower today (related to my work.) So it may not have been entirely wasted.

Fed up!!
S

Hello!
Now, I'm willing to accept that this is the drink talking (in which case referencing my work will mean that the author is Carlsberg et al.) but I always find listening to music is motivating in all kinds of ways. It is preferably combined with a long walk and a reflective mood.

That's my 1p.

Why are you doing your PhD?
S

I was unemployed.

I love my subject.

Everyone else is crap at my subject (seriously, this isn't arrogance, this is just the "gap in the literature".)

I've spent my entire education looking for a challenge.

How clever are you?
S

Quote From eska:

I recently saw a documentary about IQ and race, and saw the director speak about it with a Q&A, and according to him and some other researchers in that field (I think it would be psychology), IQ tests have long been discredited as too culturally biased: they said that the tests basically measrure person's ability to navigate the modern, westernised world, not any innate abilty and success in them has a lot to do with learned culture. Apparently, different cultural/racial groups get different scores, and research suggests its becaue they value different ways of thinking and navigating the world. Wasn't IQ invented as a way of segregating people? Eugenics and all that? I took one once and can remember thinking how culturally loaded it was. I only idid it because I was feeling really insecure about my abilities, I think that's why people do it, and perhaps also why they wave their results in the air too. I got something like 135 overall, about 80 for maths and abut 175 for conceptual intelligence. So that gets me off calculating the bill at the end of the Christmas dinner out...


I remember one question on my 9th year CATS exam - Where does a stamp go? A) Garage B) Album C) Plant Pot. I think I went with garage, because I couldn't imagine a stamp in a CD or a Plant Pot..........Unsurprisingly, I'm not from a family of stamp collectors.


Anyone seen the episode of Different Strokes when they destroy IQ tests?