Quote From theboakster:
However, when I've looked at guidance on writing conclusions they all seem to suggest that what I should be doing is not introducing any new material, but summarising what I've found in my main chapters, acknowledging what the original contribution is, and then discussing further avenues for work...
Agree, that's a conclusion.
Quote From theboakster:
and this should therefore be shorter than 10,000 words.
Disagree, depending on what material you have to discuss it could be this long.
I don't think 'taking a broader historical perspective' counts as new material really, because it's a just a synthesis of your ideas. Plus, it's not necessarily a conclusion chapter, more like a discussion chapter, so reading about what to write to in a conclusion might not be accurate.
I don't think you would get major corrections to rewrite a conclusion/discussion chapter. They are usually quite quick to write.
But I'm in the Sciences so it might be different (but mine is about 10,000 words).