Signup date: 01 Jan 2012 at 4:07am
Last login: 10 Nov 2013 at 5:58pm
Post count: 359
(1)When should the title of a figure be capitalized?
Figure 1.1 an overview of sony's...
or
Figure 1.1 An overview of Sony's...
or
Figure 1.1 An Overview of Sony's...
should "Figure" be capitalized?
(2)If lets say I want to write,
----> most of the time, the consumer would respond as, "it would be just R".
Is the double quotation above allowed? should I rephrase?
3)When referring to terms defined, is this possible:
----> the terms "Mellow" and "Glow" are...
or should it be italicized?
4)When cited papers use lowercase for names, is it ok if I use uppercase?
5)Can I italicize a word if I want to stress it?
6) Is it ok to use abbreviations on a proposal? I tend to use lots of them. I do have the abbreviations table. e.g. Biological Network, into, BN.
Hope someone could help! : [
Mate,
I read your post *hugs*
I don't even know where to begin really; I would think that "the identification of a new molecule that is more active against a cancer target", is very significant! Could you appeal?
*I might eat my own words (because I'm still in my first year, entering second!), but DON'T GIVE UP mate!
PM me if anything; I'm bumping your thread for support.
Dan
Hello,
Well, I think I have a problem : (
I realized that when I do presentations, I'm expecting people to understand some of the concepts I'm talking about. When I say "people", I mean the examiners or the panel members. Is that reasonable?
Say for example my topic is about X and subtopics xi, xii, xiii and xiv. And now I'm working on a new "discovery" say it's xv, I'm somehow expecting the panel to understand X and xi, xii, xiii and xiv, except my xv, which I will gladly explain. Is that even reasonable? Of course I would be more than happy to explain (briefly) xi, xii, xiii and xiv and X itself but it's going to be brief since I want to make way for my work, which is xv.
======= Date Modified 08 Nov 2012 11:55:26 =======
======= Date Modified 08 Nov 2012 11:51:46 =======
I just recently noticed that my work is in a mess! So, I decided to install this open source Gantt Chart software. Seems to be great having an overview of what work I should do/progress so far/etc.
What do you guys use to manage your work/progress/etc? : )
Hello Hazyjane,
Thank you for the reply.
Yes, I was thinking about it as well; perhaps during the presentation, I would just select the strongest ones, or I could further generalize the variables or grouped them further for easier analysis - does that make sense?
This particular research I'm doing is a small part of the main thesis; it's conducted to support the main thesis. I'm developing some model for this X problem my field is facing. But I need some "social" survey research so that I have updated evidence that the "problem" is still "existing" and are being faced by the users. Thus, the users would need to be surveyed. Hope that helps in some ways.
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree