======= Date Modified 18 Aug 2009 23:28:48 =======
======= Date Modified 18 Aug 2009 23:28:18 =======
======= Date Modified 18 Aug 2009 23:27:36 =======
Quote From walminskipeasucker:
Actually, not to be a pedant, but I think that sample size does matter very much with qualitative research. Too few and you may not have any kind of generalisability or transferabilty (not really a strength of qual anyway) or be able to generate a good enough description and/or understanding of what you are studying, but too much and you may not be able to generate the 'in-depth insight' typical of qualitative research. I could be wrong there, as I'm just thinking off-the-cuff.
Anyway, I agree that there's no such thing as a boring PhD to someone that is interested in it. :-)
So because someone else finds it interesting I have to?
I'm entitled to my opinion. No one criticised anyone else on their opinions on PhD projects until I posted. This thread is about what PhDs people think are weird and I answered, like everyone else did, but not as summarised.
walminskipeasucker papers are always criticised for not having high enough numbers. Like when I read about what a certain group of people I fall into think, I always think, they didn't ask me. Also some of the people who criticised me are assuming that if someone gets a PhD, therefore their project can not be argued with, which isn't the bases of academia at all.
:-)
Btw PhDbug, I'm disappointed that you're disappointed that I find a PhD on texting boring.
Edit: It's just a forum, don't it so seriously.