Quote From emmaki:Quote From Larrydavid:
======= Date Modified 15 Jun 2011 18:18:01 =======
The 3rd part is the key point. It's saying that even if we are trying to be objective when reading interview texts, we ultimately impose our own meaning onto them.
So, when we read an interview, we are influenced by our own belefs and we understand them under this scope??????
Yep. It's the subjective vs. objective argument. (I guess you are working in a social science discipline maybe?) It's saying that as much as we try to interpret interview texts objectively, we cannot help but impose our own subjective interpretations onto the person, the information, or the situation.