I think most people are aware of differences in the PhD process in the U.S: several years longer, ABD (all but dissertation) status, large emphasis on teaching (consensus that grad students are taken advantage of as cheap labour), but I've been wondering about the employment market.
Some advice blogs (particularly http://theprofessorisin.com) lay out such specifics requirements for getting a job post PhD. For example, that you should not waste your time going to conferences (unless for the most highly-regarded), that you should only try to publish in the very best journals, that you should hold off on turning your PhD into a book you get a deal with a University Press. 'The professor' also claims that publishing in edited collections (and book reviews) are a waste of time.
Maybe these should just be considered 'ideals', but is the job market in the UK/Europe for instance really AS competitive?
I realise there is an expectation to publish, etc. but I feel like attending conferences is seen as an important part, too. And that publications in lesser-known journals do still count.
I suppose I'm asking if those hiring are quite as particular in what they look for, or is it acceptable to show that you have been active involved in the research community, in its various forms.
All thoughts welcome. :-)