Hi MissSpacey and Sue,
Thank you both so much for your advice-it has not gone to proof yet so I will do as suggested. I definitely want to correct it and have peace of mind when it does get published.

Cookies

Hi,
Being new to the publications arena, I am wondering if anyone can offer some views on my dilemma.
I finished my masters and submitted part of my work for publication. The paper was accepted subject to revisions. I completed the revisions as requested by reviewers and the paper was then accepted and will be published in next 4 months. I have since realised that the descriptive statistics which the reviewer sought and which I completed for the purposes of developing the paper are technically incorrect ( although the reviewer accepted them). My supervisor is a co author and has not picked up on the errors. I am unsure of the best way to approach this dilemma. I have already made the necessary changes in the manuscript and the overall results and discussion do not change.

I am in a dilemma as to what to do- withdraw it and resubmit with the amendments? ( presumably it would have to go to review again) How would I explain this in the least damaging way to the editor? Also my supervisor has given some input -
Any advice on how to approach this dilemma would be greatly appreciated and would ease my anxiety.

Cookies