I'm doing Chemistry+Pharmaceutical&Forensic Science. I enjoy the molecular-biology parts best. If I would like to do a PhD in molecular-biology. Is a conversion MSc to a biological subject any good? I was advised that BSc-MSc-PhD doesn't look good-it suggests a poor BSc, the MSc was needed to do a PhD. I'm on my way to a first, and would like to do a masters before I decide about PhDs. Does a MSc really look bad? Will changing subject direction be frowned upon? Will this hinder chances of getting a PhD studentship?
To be honest, if you have a first on your CV then why should it make any difference? MSc are not frowned upon if they are done for good reason, like as a means to convert to a new discipline (like yourself). If you choose a good MSc which allows you to learn the lab techniques as well as the theory, then i cant see any probs.
...and you're right, an MSc can look dodgy if you have a 2:2, because then it just highlights the fact that you basically HAVE to do an MSc if you want to stand any chance of getting a PhD. I think you'll find that very few people with a 2:2 and an MSc actually get funding. It might not be right, but its just the way it is
An MSc is a GREAT way of changing disciplines from one science to another - it certainly wont be frowned upon by anybody recruiting students for a PhD in the Biological sciences. If you're interested in an MSc in molecular/cell biology, have a look at:
http://www.biols.sussex.ac.uk/pgteach/degrees/dcb/Index.htm
Gavin - thats controversial. its all about how the funding bodies see it, because they are the ones that impose the 2:1 restriction (not the institution). However, a lot of them do state that a 2:2 plus an MSc does equal a 2:1 (e.g. BBSRC). But as im sure you can imagine, you would have a better chance of getting offered a PhD place if you had a 2:1 or higher.
An MSc won't look bad and would help you change disciplines. However you may find that it is unecessary, particularly if your final year research project involved/involves molecular biology.
If you want to do a masters degree before commiting to 3 years of a PhD, then an MRes may be a much better option. This will give you a much better idea of what a PhD will be like. You may also be able to convert to a PhD before finishing the MRes, thus saving yourself an expensive extra year in education.
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree