Hello All,
So I started a PhD 2 years ago and it took a while for me to find my focus, but once I did I worked hard to try to make it work. I researched the area and felt it was the right direction as well as asking around and explaining what it was that I was attempting to accomplish and so many people loved the idea which filled me with confidence.
At my first years review panel there where questions but the panel liked the idea as well and passed me on to the second year so I continued my research with some minor alterations that had been the sum of the feedback from the review panel. I even went and presented my work at a conference which boosted my confidence even more.
Now I have recently had my second years review and they have told me that they have serious issues with the direction I am taking and don't think I should continue with it. I have gone from being full of confidence about this area I have spent 2 years working on to thinking 'what have I been wasting my time on?'
I don't know where I have gone wrong but apparently the rumour mill has been going and there are rumours of harshly worded emails being sent between the review panel chair and my supervisory team saying I have been grossly let down and because of this I will be lucky to get an MRes out my work.
I guess a question I need to figure out the answer to is have they let me down or is it all my fault for not seeing things in the right way. And if it is my supervisory teams fault then what can I do about it?
I know of someone who has been in this position. She just got told to change direction slightly and then got an extra 6 months of funding. I think it will all work out in the end because your university wants to you complete and graduate.
What's your relationship like with your main supervisor, or your supervisory team? I think I'd sit down with them as soon as possible and talk about how to move forward - the main thing here is to find out what you need to do to be on course for your PhD. Don't give up after your two years' hard work!
Wow, how is this even possible? At no point in time in the past 2 years not a single person told you they thought your research had potholes? For 2 years it was magical and now its trash? Something is missing here.
Did they give a reason for their 180 degree opinion on your research?
This post can only go one of 3 ways: Either you COMPLETELY ignored the few critics you had the past 2 years, if not your supervisors are clinically insane, or there is some crucial information you have not shared here.
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree