Hi guys, I'm busy writing/editing manuscripts for publication based on my PhD thesis(Life Sciences student here), but my reviewers keep saying my discussions are too speculative and repetitive. However, the work I have done is quite novel and not been attempted by anyone before, so there is very little existing data to compare my work against, forcing me to make leaps in logic. Please help, I'm getting frustrated here!
Don't be frustrated, when I had a task like that, I just created a list of ideas, that I was going to use in my work, and then just placed them in the order, that they should appear in the work. Try this method, it always helps me.
Anyway, You can always use some special servises, like this one http://www.uk.essay-writing-place.com/
Good luck!
My first suggestion is getting other academics involved - this might seem like a cop-put, but it is a good way to pick up tips about academic writing.
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree