Signup date: 02 Oct 2013 at 11:45am
Last login: 02 Oct 2013 at 3:21pm
Post count: 2
Hi plantclean, thanks for your reply. My supervisor has said very little except that he is sorry and we will have to wait for the report before the next step. He did seem surprised though so I don't think he had any idea it would go that way. I'll just have to wait and see what happens.
Thanks Uttara, I am trying to stay positive and sort of believe that all things happen for a reason. It's just so difficult when you put all that work in and you think everything's going to be fine and it isn't. I'm sure something will work out in the end.
I was just wondering if anyone on here had had a similar experience to mine. I have just completed (what I thought was) a 7-year PT PhD whilst working as a laboratory technician at a UK uni. I had a terribly stressful time getting my thesis submitted as after all that time, I obviously wanted to make sure I passed and wanted to ensure it was as good as possible.
So I submitted eventually on the understanding from my supervisor that the project, the chapters I had put together and the thesis were of the standard to warrant a PhD. Supervisor was concerned about me passing the viva as I am not the most vocal of people so in the run-up we had hours of viva question practice to prepare and by the day itself, I was feeling confident.
So I went through the viva (2 3/4 hours), answered almost all of the questions they asked me about my thesis, wasn't grilled about any particular aspect and by the time we had worked through all the things they wanted to ask about the thesis I was feeling relieved and confident that I had done enough to pass, with major corrections at the very least, particularly when the external said 'Thank you, you've taken us through your thesis very well'.
Imagine my shock and devastation when I was called back in to be told that I hadn't reached the required standard for a PhD according to the university guidelines and that I was being recommended for an MPhil as there was not enough evidence of originality or that I had driven the project forward (was asked one question on each which I assumed i had answered adequately) and that I was not sure where the work would go in the future. I was asked nothing about this during the exam, and was only asked about this after the event, when I was in a state of shock and probably couldn't have answered my own name.
Has this happened to anyone else?
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree