It must vary from institution to institution but the one I'm at requires a date to be set during the nomination of examiners. For me it was agreed upon shortly after confirming my examiners and is about 6 weeks after submission.

Hi, I'm a PhD student in a UK university doing chemistry and submitting my thesis this week, I'm at the end of my third year. First time posting here, didn't know things like this existed (wish I did during my first year) and was just after some advice I guess.


I have an incredibly optimistic supervisor, who only once "was disappointed in me" which was worse than any scolding I've ever received. Anyway he has been helpful during the writing process, reading each chapter and giving me corrections and has seen 2 full drafts in total. About a month ago he said in an email "It is much improved on previous versions and even if you did nothing more, would be worth submitting for examination." along with some suggestions.

My only issues I suppose are mental at this stage, I feel like a fraud and that I've only begun to learn things about my subject I should have learned two years ago. I am slightly dreading the viva, that they will ask me something I should know and it'll become apparent. It's awkward to talk to anyone about this kind of stuff and if I ever begin to bring things up of this vein to my sup he makes points like half of my thesis is published, it's an adequate length for the subject (26,000 words) etc.

Sorry for the wall of text but have any of you had these last moment doubts? I feel so close to finishing but every time I read my final draft I start to get a headache and hate it. I'm starting a new (non academia) job in a couple of weeks too which hasn't helped.

Thanks for reading this even if you don't have anything to say.

Mull