Thank you very much for your answers:)

Hey all! recently heard back from a journal that a paper I'd written had not acceptable for publication in its present form. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. and i hace received the reports for both reviews, the first have gived a positif feeedback and have mentionned that the paper is suitable to the journal, and the quality of this paper is marginal above the level of acceptance for publication and gived me a very specific question on the proposed mathematical model. The second have gived a very negative evaluation of the paper exactly the opposite of the other review, but also with stupids questions that show he has not read the paper or it is not his area of ​​research.

I need you to answer me on these two questions:

1- I do not understand exactly the term : not acceptable for publication in its present form?. (Accepted under Revision or i need to improve the paper to be accepted under revesion or what?) beacuse my supervisor as second author said that the paper it is still not accepted, it is to review before the publisher can make a final decision.

2- the report of the second review (automatic report generated by the website tools of the journal) does not contain any relevants questions just his opinion on the paper and He only mentioned negative things and nothing of specific. I do not know what to reply him in my report?

Help please.

thanks.