If you have failed to complete your PhD or have failed your final submission, it can be a challenging and disheartening experience. However, it's important to remember that this setback does not define you or your future prospects. Here are some steps you can take to move forward:

1.Take a break and regroup: It's important to take some time to process your emotions and recharge. Take some time off to do things that bring you joy and relaxation.
2. Review your feedback: Review the feedback provided by your supervisor or examiners and identify areas for improvement. This will help you to understand what went wrong and how you can improve your work.
3. Seek support: Reach out to your supervisor or mentor for support and guidance on how to move forward. They may be able to provide valuable insights and suggestions for improvement.
4. Consider your options: Consider your options for resubmitting your work, seeking additional support or resources, or pursuing a different path altogether.
5.Create a plan: Create a plan of action that outlines your goals, strategies, and timeline for moving forward. This will help you to stay focused and motivated.
Keep a positive mindset: Remember that setbacks are a normal part of the learning process and that you have the skills and resilience to overcome them. Keep a positive mindset and focus on the opportunities for growth and improvement.
Remember, falling at the final hurdle does not mean the end of your academic or professional journey. With persistence, hard work, and support, you can overcome this setback and achieve your goals.

Here is a template for a PhD project proposal:
1. Title Page
The title of your project
Your name and contact information
Your supervisor's name and contact information
The date
2. Abstract
A brief summary of your proposed research, including the research question, objectives, methodology, and expected outcomes.
3. Introduction
Background information on the research topic
A clear statement of the research problem
The research question(s) and objectives
A brief overview of the methodology
4. Literature Review
A comprehensive review of relevant literature related to your research topic
Identification of any gaps or inconsistencies in the existing research
Discussion of how your research will contribute to the existing body of knowledge
5. Methodology
A detailed explanation of the research design and methodology, including data collection methods, data analysis techniques, and any relevant ethical considerations
Discussion of the strengths and limitations of the chosen methodology
6. Expected Outcomes
A description of the expected outcomes of the research, including any potential contributions to the field
Discussion of any potential limitations or challenges that may affect the outcomes
7. Timetable
A detailed timetable outlining the various stages of the research project, including deadlines for data collection, analysis, and writing.
8. References
A list of all the sources cited in the proposal, formatted according to the relevant citation style.
Remember that this is just a template and you may need to adapt it to fit the specific requirements of your PhD program and research topic. It is also important to consult with your supervisor or advisor for guidance and feedback throughout the proposal writing process.

A professor once told me that pursuing a PhD can extend one's youth. As I became more acquainted with this way of life, I saw where that comment came from. Throughout my academic path, I understood that the PhD life is a perpetual process of inquiry and discovery, resulting in both delight and disappointment, much like when you're a kid. The difference is that you can't truly shape your childhood to be as joyful as you want it to be, but your PhD "extended childhood" is entirely under your hands. So, in order to assist you in locating a PhD program that is a good fit for you.

In most scientific domains, literature reviews are in high demand. Their requirement derives from the growing volume of scientific publications. For example, compared to 1991, three, eight, and forty times more publications on malaria, obesity, and biodiversity were indexed in the Web of Science in 2008. Scientists cannot be expected to evaluate in depth every new publication relevant to their interests in the face of such mountains of documents. As a result, relying on periodical summaries of recent research is useful and required. Although original research is the primary source of recognition for scientists, timely literature assessments can lead to fresh synthetic discoveries and are frequently extensively read. However, for such summaries to be meaningful, they must be professionally produced.