I know this thread is quite old now, but I saw the title and it made me remember: there was a 75-year-old lady in one of my undergraduate classes in the science department! Think she did a BSc. in Environmental Science.

Something to think about.

======= Date Modified 24 Feb 2010 16:19:49 =======
That's fine as long as you reference it. If you've changed anything yourself during drawing, you can writre "modified after Smith et al. 1998" - I did this in my thesis and it was fine, so no, shouldn't be classed as plagiarism. (up)

If it's for a journal or something you want to publish I don't think you're allowed, but def. just for your thesis or a presentation it's fine as long as you reference.

Can't go wrong with Simpsons, 24, CSI, Skins... meanwhile the wife loves Gok Won, How To Look Good Naked...

Sigh!

Depends on subject, and what's acceptable at your uni. or perhaps in your department. In a science-based PhD, I was told a good thesis should be around 5 - 6 chapters, 300 - 400 pages, anything up to 100,000 words...

Something like that anyway - this is all from memory so I could be wrong.

Hi Octopus,

I guess I could say I'm in a similar situation, and for what it's worth I tend to think like Sue's posted below. I have a strange sense/feeling about things in life and choices to make, and my family always told me that this is a wonderful gift that I should always trust.

Basically, I completely finished my PhD last year and have been looking for work since. I'm also not really interested in staying in academia, so most of the jobs I've been applying for are in companies/industries etc. (I'm also molecular biology/biochemistry!) Anyway, a small private company quite far away from me accepted me to work for them last month... I had the same awful choice to make as you, and I went round and asked my family and friends for advice. On one hand, this job was: in a lovely, quite famous location; great for my CV; good long-term future; opportunity to use my skills and learn new ones; opportunities for good research. But on the other hand: company very small; salary rather low for a PhD; employers not native and therefore difficult to talk with and very slow; huge pressure and responsibility on me if I took the post, right from day 1; would mean a hard move (relocation) for my wife and I if I accepted.

As you can guess, I had 'fors' and 'againsts' from family/friends. In the end, I went with my own gut feeling and turned it down because I think I can do better! Why devote to such a huge move and pressure, when I wouldn't have been happy, comfortable or had enough people to help/guide me. That was my choice, and my wife was with me 100%.

Yes, I'm still looking for work now, but I don't regret my decision. There are still some good jobs/posts out there if you keep looking. I've had some positive feedback recently about a role I'd love... fingers crossed! Also waiting for many more in the next few days/weeks to come.

Moral of my story...? Not sure, but I guess what it all means is that it's YOUR CHOICE, and you should go with your strongest feelings and choose what's right/best for you (and your family if applicable). Best of luck to you whatever you choose.

But you can get "Browne's" paper right? Why not just look at how they referenced "Black & White" and even if the full information isn't there you can search online for the full ref. (up)

It's cold and dark up here... what's that smell? :-s(sprout):p

There are salary checkers on most job-finding/recruitment web sites these days. Have a look around and type in some science jobs you think you might be interested in. Typically (at the moment) most post-doc positions should be no less than £27,000-£28,000 per year in the U.K. However, don't get your hopes up too high for industry, as these days with the credit crunch and so many graduates/PhD's about, industrial experience is a major factor that companies are on the look out for regardless of education (which I think is ridiculous!).

With a PhD, though, it is much easier to climb the ladder and get higher pay sooner than someone without in most decent industries/companies. Just be warned, though, that initially you may have no choice but to start out at a rather poor salary when you first move into industry from academia.

This is just my opinion and don't know if that really helps much... perhaps other people will have better ideas. Pharmacology and Biotechnology are still doing really well in Europe and there are a lot of good opportunities out there, so don't worry 8-)

There's quite a few useful threads about viva prep. Take a look a Moomin's 'I Think I'm Going To Be Sick' one for example.

You need to know your thesis inside out, as ultimately the viva will involve going through it piece by piece and checking with you the what's, where's, why's and how's of what you did and wrote down.

If you know of any gaps in your thesis, don't worry about it too much but instead admit it to yourself and whoever's interviewing you. Then you can always go back and get more information, suggestions etc. if necessary and fill in the blanks. In your viva if you don't know something, it's better to say so than dig yourself into a deeper hole. There should be nothing aggressive or confrontational in a viva, just a general check-up that you did the work and understand it with some background knowledge on the side.


Try and correct all grammar and spelling mistakes first, well before the viva! You'll feel better and your thesis will be easier and (hopefully) more satisfying to read :-)


Relax, it's an awful time, but even the viva itself is better and more fun than the weeks leading up to it ;-)

It's a good indication, but it's not the "be-all-and-end-all" when it comes to choosing your PhD. It may perhaps be useful to know what subject you're wanting to do, and which countries you're interested in. Remember, different universities specialise in different subjects, but that doesn't mean that a small, almost insignificant department in some institute that doesn't specialise in your subject/research wont have a great and exciting opportunity for a novel PhD topic, and vice-versa.

DNA concentrations can be determined spectrophotometrically, but it's cumbersome and not very accurate. I had this problem during my PhD, but I stuck with the SYBR-green. Fold-differences in starting template concentration between any two samples can be found by using:

2[to the power of](Ct2-Ct1).

PCR is exponential, not linear, hence the 2[to the power of].

Hope this helps. (up)

Hi Teek,

It's good/common practice that all tables, graphs, figures etc. be fully labeled (and referenced accordingly if you've 'borrowed' or modified them from a paper or book) and then listed in your table/figure lists at the start of your thesis. But here's something I think you need to ask yourself and perhaps discuss with your supervisor:

If all these tables are so "basic" and just things like reagents etc. do you really need them? I'm a scientist (biochemistry) and I'm not sure if every university has the same rules, but basically I was told that if it's just simple, very common reagents/protocols you've used then it's fine to simply write something along the lines of: "reagent X was prepared exactly as described by Smith et al. 1998" and/or "the protocol was performed as described by Smith et al. 1999, except that reagent X was heated to 75 degrees C instead of 65..."

You get the idea right!? There's certainly no need to list every reagent and kit you use - that's very old fashioned, unless everything you're doing is completely novel.