Signup date: 27 Apr 2007 at 3:27pm
Last login: 05 Jun 2007 at 11:25am
Post count: 16
Hi all,
Thanks for your advices. I have got the official confirmation that I will be given two choices: 1) minior correction for MPhil. 2) Major correction for re-exam for PhD without oral examination.
Is that common for people like me being given choices? Does this mean my thesis is really borderline of a PhD?
Hi all,
I am preparing my Viva which will be held within 3 weeks. Horribly I found an error which happens in 7 equations in my thesis. The big summation sigma should starts from j=1 instead of j=0. These are just type errors, but they should make the equation logic wrong :(
I really don't know how the external examiner will do with this kind of errors :(.
Thanks for all your ideas. I feel more confident now. I think the external has hundreds of reasons to fail a person if he really wants. I can understand that famous persons are not normally aggressive because they are on the top. It's quite common for them to see poor ideas from their point of view.
I had been working in a field that totally irrelevant with my PhD project for 1.5 year. The thesis is finished in my spare time. Neither me nor my supervisor think my PhD project can be useful in the future.
God knows what will happen. I really hope the coming holiday summer makes the external happier and passing me easily
Hi Hairui, Shani and Heather,
Thanks for your advices. I will get someone to read my thesis and get feedback. A mock viva has been scheduled in two weeks with my supervisor. I will try my best to prepare it. It has been 6 months since I submitted. And it has been 1.5 year since I left the university where I was having my PhD.
It sounds like people do get failed straight away
Hi all.
I have just been informed the name of my external examiner. Unfortunately, he is a very reputable professional in my research area. This makes me extremely panic :(
My thesis is weak, from my point of view. I only have three publications (one short paper, one refered as first aurthor, one refered as second aurthor). All of them are published in small conferences. My supervisor does not have any experience of supervising PhD student before. Thus, I think his permission of my submission does not actually mean I am at the pass standard. Now, I will face the famous person who can easily find holes in my thesis... I think I am half way towards fail now :(
Does anyone think the famous person will be more strict than normal?
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree