Signup date: 01 Jul 2019 at 11:10pm
Last login: 23 Aug 2019 at 3:27pm
Post count: 5
I submitted my thesis a month and a day ago. Although I understand that it may vary in general (I had colleagues who had their viva as soon as six weeks to as long as three months, sometimes four but that was due to extraordinary circumstances), from what I am reading, the expected viva dates for theses submitted during the summer months could be in September (more often than not, end or last week of September but I'm not sure if they are representative). The question though is, which part of the month is it most realistic to expect the date to fall in? Due to certain commitments I have planned, a late September viva seems fine for me, though first week of October seems best. I got a formal email from my uni's exams office that copies were sent to the examiners just last week (3 weeks after I handed it in) and say what if the internal examiner has not gotten it out of his letterbox yet. Are theses submitted to the designated point in July but only sent out last week (2nd full week in August) realistically headed for a late-September (at earliest)/early-October viva?
I am a little nervous of submitting since I have gotten word that it will likely end up in examiners 'encouraging [me] to do a bit more work before it is approved'. A few have interpreted it as 'headed for a major referral'. Have there been instances in the past where someone who has gotten comments that the thesis wasn't 'analytic enough' in terms of the use of the relevant frameworks went on to pass, i.e. even with major corrections?
Hi! I am 20 days prior to submitting and am feeling a bit nervous. The supervisor has returned my draft with comments. In general, he said that although as a narrative the thesis goes well, the analytical parts are a bit problematic but advises that I have no time to address them. According to him, there were significant improvements nonetheless compared to the original chapters and that as it stands, it is at a point where the examiners could ask me to do bits more work before it gets approved. Does this mean that it has a decent chance of getting 'major corrections' (as opposed to a full resubmission)? Have there been outcomes that have turned out slightly better than expected given that a major issue is that the thesis wasn't analytical enough?
I just want to do my best with what's left.
PostgraduateForum Is a trading name of FindAUniversity Ltd
FindAUniversity Ltd, 77 Sidney St, Sheffield, S1 4RG, UK. Tel +44 (0) 114 268 4940 Fax: +44 (0) 114 268 5766
An active and supportive community.
Support and advice from your peers.
Your postgraduate questions answered.
Use your experience to help others.
Enter your email address below to get started with your forum account
Enter your username below to login to your account
An email has been sent to your email account along with instructions on how to reset your password. If you do not recieve your email, or have any futher problems accessing your account, then please contact our customer support.
or continue as guest
To ensure all features on our website work properly, your computer, tablet or mobile needs to accept cookies. Our cookies don’t store your personal information, but provide us with anonymous information about use of the website and help us recognise you so we can offer you services more relevant to you. For more information please read our privacy policy
Agree Agree