======= Date Modified 03 24 2008 01:24:56 =======
ive to critique methodological approaches used by 6 authors, but it is a literature review of 3,000 words

my problem is if i identify the methodology as a topic sentence. then proceed to point out the aspects in the supporting sentences etc.

my problem is where does a discussion of the methodological approaches end? what kinds of points or aspects do you point out and when do you know the end point, so you know thats a sufficient amount to get a really good grade?:$

am looking for advice from a phd who has experience of doing on from the masters or phd?

if you had a critique or to do just a literature review style essay (not a thesis) how would you structure it?

what would be the main ingredients? masters level, at 3,000 words, ive got 6 authors?

ive loads of books on thesis writing etc. and ive already done alot already. but i would like to hear other people's opinions?

thanks

ive a week, but want to get it done in 2 days, any ideas?

Hi, are there any websites, which present a list of excellent vocabulary I can incorporate into my essay, so every sentence sounds like its critiquing the debates?

or any guides to create complex sentences (interesting sentences), which integrate numerous points within a short space - so the reader is compelled to read to the end...

does anyone know any good websites which can advance this way of writing to a high standard?